New Antibiotic may Help Patients for Whom Existing Antibiotics are No Longer Effective
        
        From the corporate.dukehealth.org archives. Content may be out of date.
    
September 19, 2000
TORONTO - In the continuing race to stay ahead of the
    ever-changing microbial world, researchers from Duke University
    Medical Center believe that a new class of antibiotics may
    prove effective against life-threatening infections that fail
    to respond to vancomycin, the antibiotic of last resort for an
    increasing number of bacterial infections.
The researchers are encouraged that the results of a
    retrospective study of a small number of hospitalized patients
    with severe antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections are
    strong enough to support the initiation of a large multi-center
    prospective trial.
The antibiotic, known as quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D),
    successfully treated infections in more than 75 percent of the
    54 patients who were given the drug on a compassionate use
    basis after all other therapies failed.
"Since the number of infections that are becoming resistant
    to our best medicines continues to rise, we need new
    antibiotics to help these patients," said Dr. Vance Fowler, an
    infectious disease specialist at Duke and lead investigator of
    the study.
"The results of this study support the hypothesis that this
    newer class of agents can play an important role in taking care
    of patients with life-threatening infections," Fowler
    continued. "We feel that a large, multi-center trial should be
    conducted to determine how these new agents should be
    used."
Fowler prepared the results of his study for presentation
    Sept. 19 at the 40th annual meeting of the Interscience
    Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Q/D is
    manufactured by Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany, N.J., who
    supported the research.
Most of the patients in the trial had bloodstream infections
    caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),
    one of the most commonly encountered bacteria in a growing
    number of hospitals. For these patients, the treatment of
    choice is the antibiotic vancomycin.
"Vancomycin is a good drug and is still the treatment of
    choice for MRSA, but we need an alternative when it doesn't
    work or the patient can't tolerate it," Fowler said.
Currently, there are only two approved new agents - Q/D
    being one of them - that have shown any effectiveness in
    treating patients in whom vancomycin therapy has failed. The
    other agent is Linezolid (Zyvox), a drug produced by Pharmacia
    and Upjohn.
Fowler emphasizes that while the results of his analysis are
    promising, there are a number of reasons why a larger study
    should be conducted before he would recommend widespread use of
    the drug for this difficult-to-treat patient population. He
    cited the small number of patients, the retrospective nature of
    his analysis and the fact it was not possible to follow the
    patients over time to see if their infections returned at a
    later date.
"While the number of patients was small, this study still
    represents the largest group of patients to date who failed
    vancomycin therapy and were treated with Q/D," Fowler said.
    "The results offer a reasonable first step in the design of the
    definitive trial."
To test Q/D's effectiveness, the researchers went to an
    international database of more than 6,000 patients who had been
    treated with Q/D. They then searched for those treated in the
    United States, whose medical records were available and who
    failed vancomycin therapy, and ended up with 54 patients. To be
    eligible for review, the patients had to be hospitalized for at
    least one of the four most difficult-to-treat sources of
    infection: bone and joint infections, catheter-related
    infections, infective endocarditis and skin infections.
About 30 percent of the patients with endocarditis showed
    improvement; in the other three groups, greater than 80 percent
    of patients improved after being treated with Q/D.
Fowler said it is ironic that the greatest source of these
    infections is the hospital setting.
"These bugs are a product of our medical successes," Fowler
    said. "The tools that we use to treat people and save lives -
    like invasive procedures, intravenous lines and intubations -
    are the things that put people at the greatest risk for these
    infections."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates
    that more than 2 million Americans each year acquire these
    in-hospital infections, and between 60,000 and 80,000 die. The
    culprit in the majority of the cases is S. aureus, which
    typically enters patients through surgical wounds and
    intravenous line sites, and can be passed very easily from
    person to person.
Researchers warn that when antibiotics are used
    indiscriminately, bacteria with mild resistance can develop and
    pass this resistance to other bacteria, creating newer strains
    that become increasingly resistant to the antibiotic.
An example of how much bacteria can change in response to
    medicine is provided by penicillin, the first effective
    antibiotic. When it was first introduced in the 1940s, it was
    effective against almost all S. aureus strains; today, about 99
    percent of S. aureus is resistant to penicillin.
Joining Fowler in the study were, from Duke, Richard Drew,
    Dr. John Perfect and Dr. Scott Palmer; and from Aventis
    Pharmaceuticals, Dr. Bruce Lavin.