Mouse Study Shows How “Hair-of-the-Dog” Approach Works to Treat Allergies
DURHAM, N.C. – The hair-of-the-dog-that-bit-you is a time-honored allergy remedy for a good reason: It works.
But how it works has not been well understood.
Now a research team led by Duke Health, using mice as the models, has described the cellular processes that occur during “rush desensitization.” The approach involves giving a small dose of the allergy trigger – peanuts or bee poison or even chemotherapy -- to the susceptible patient in small, yet increasing doses over a short period.
“We have known for at least 100 years that the approach is effective,” said Soman Abraham, Ph.D, senior author of a study published online Sept. 26 in the Journal of Clinical Investigation. Abraham is professor in the departments of Pathology, Immunology, and Microbiology and Molecular Genetics at Duke University School of Medicine and professor in the Program of Emerging Infectious Diseases at Duke-National University Singapore Medical School. “People who have terrible, even life-threatening reactions to certain antigens can then tolerate an exposure – if just for a short period of time.”
Understanding how the process works could lead to new and better therapies for managing allergies to foods, dust, pollen, drugs and insect bites that cause serious and even fatal reactions for millions of people annually.
Abraham and colleagues employed different experiments to track the cellular events during allergic reactions and after rush desensitization. The team included A. Wesley Burks, M.D., who, before he left Duke for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, pioneered a peanut allergy approach for children that relied on rush desensitization principals.
Allergy symptoms arise from a process that starts in the immune system’s mast cells, which are white blood cells that harbor tiny containers called granules filled chemicals involved in the inflammatory process such as histamines and heparins.
When a person is exposed to an allergen such as pollen for the first time, the body makes an antibody known as immunoglobulin E, or IgE, which is capable of binding to the allergen whenever another exposure occurs.
Once produced, these IgE antibodies collect in large numbers on the surface of mast cells. During subsequent exposures, the allergen is promptly recognized by IgE, which binds to it and immobilizes it on the mast cell. That process initiates a signal that triggers expulsion of the granules from the mast cell, releasing the inflammatory chemicals.
The result is allergy symptoms such as sneezing, wheezing, itching and swelling. In severe cases, when mast cells lining blood vessels release their inflammatory contents throughout the body, the reaction can be life-threatening.
It’s long been understood that rush desensitization therapy somehow disrupts the mast cells through the repeated exposure of allergens over several hours or days.
Abraham and colleagues found that the disruption occurs inside the mast cells, among tiny filaments called actin that line the inner envelop of the cell. When confronted with an allergen, the actin breaks down and rushes to the center of the cell, creating the conditions necessary for the eruption of the granules.
When tiny doses of allergen are administered during rush desensitization, however, the actin are fooled into disassembling, and prematurely move to the center of the cell. The misplacement of the cellular actin, however, does not initiate expulsion of the granules and the inflammatory chemicals. Even with repeated and escalating exposures, the cascade of events is avoided and there is no allergic reaction.
“Having figured out the mechanism, we should now be able to find new drugs that can target the actin and prolong the desensitization,” said lead author W.X. Gladys Ang, a graduate student in the Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology at Duke. “This will allow for recovery to be slower, enabling people to be tolerant of allergens for longer periods.”
In addition to Ang, Abraham and Burke, study authors include Alison M. Church, Mike Kulis and Hae Woong Choi.
The study received funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-AI-068074, R01-AI-096305, R01-HL-112921).